<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Playout Intelligence - Latest Comments in Eight Reasons Why Buying IT Now Is NOT Critical</title><link>http://playoutintelligence.disqus.com/</link><description>product &amp; service innovation, business and technology strategy, content capitalization, playout intelligence, telco2.0.</description><atom:link href="https://playoutintelligence.disqus.com/eight_reasons_why_buying_it_now_is_not_critical/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:20:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Eight Reasons Why Buying IT Now Is NOT Critical</title><link>http://www.playoutintelligence.com/2009/02/it-not-critical/#comment-17992203</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Daniel W. Rasmus&lt;/cite&gt;, a &lt;a href="http://cid-c07907dba0e3bea6.profile.live.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://cid-c07907dba0e3bea6.profile.live.com/"&gt;Futurist in Washington&lt;/a&gt; wrote &lt;a href="http://future-of-work.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!C07907DBA0E3BEA6!1268.entry" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://future-of-work.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!C07907DBA0E3BEA6!1268.entry"&gt;a great and valued response to my post&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Please go ahead and read his posting, here is my response to him:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hello Daniel,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I really like and appreciate your comments and fully underwrite them. You do make a couple of assumptions, though, and I would 100% follow you under these assumptions (as I said in my post, I intended to make some bold statements as a counter opinion). I especially like one of the recurring thoughts of- and I paraphrase - "If your business model relies on IT, you better make sure it works - effectively and efficient".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;And sometimes people might not realize how much their business model relies - or could rely - on IT. I recently helped a large wholesale appliance installation company and a one-man-show cabinet-maker to generate and track sales leads through an IT-based system, including social networking advertisment campaigns, dedicated blog sponsorship, and local sponsorship. I guess they never thought that this part of their business model was flawed because they used old computer systems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am divided on your point of new talent attraction and "latest cutting edge IT stuff" as a must have - that is certainly true for some sectors (mine definitely!), not so much in other industries. I think this is a case-by-case decision, but you make a valid point here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;In terms of "IT for customer relationship management with customers from Delhi" I certainly agree, a good example. And, as you also point out, just a part of the equation. I quoted some great comments by Seth Godin and Tom Peters in &lt;a href="http://www.playoutintelligence.com/2009/01/07/tech-and-customer-service/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.playoutintelligence.com/2009/01/07/tech-and-customer-service/"&gt;http://www.playoutintellige...&lt;/a&gt; from a recent video interview they did with McKinsey, maybe you find that worth watching.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyways, I hope you get lots of responses, I myself am interested to see both sides discussed. And of course as an IT innovation geek I'd like to see more geeky stuff around me ;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thorsten Claus</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:20:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>